Comparison最終更新：2026-07-29
Hailuo 02 vs Veo 3.1
Compare Hailuo 02 and Veo 3.1: credits, resolution, camera controls, and when to iterate vs ship.
Hailuo 02 — 最適な用途：
- +Narrative and dramatic sequences
- +Privacy-conscious uploads (base64)
- +Camera-driven motion drafts
- +Pre-production iteration before premium models
Veo 3.1 — 最適な用途：
- +Professional commercial shoots
- +Cinematic B-roll and establishing shots
- +4K quality requirements
- +Text-in-video scenes
- +Brand-consistent content series
| Feature | MiniMax | HotVeo 3.1 Google |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | |
| Price | 5 credits/video | 5 credits/video |
| Duration | 5–10s | 8s fixed |
| Resolution | 512p–1080p | 720p–4K |
| Aspect Ratios | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4 | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 21:9 |
| Native Audio | No | No |
| 先頭フレーム参照 | Yes | Yes |
| 最終フレーム参照 | Yes | No |
| Base64 Support | Yes | No |
| Negative Prompt | Yes | No |
| Prompt Enhancement | Yes | No |
| Camera Control | Yes | No |
Hailuo 02の弱点
- -No native audio
- -Not the cheapest credits/video
- -Slower path for quick throwaway clips
- -Less brand awareness than Veo/Kling/Sora
Veo 3.1の弱点
- -Fixed 8-second clip duration
- -No native audio generation
- -No negative prompt control
- -No camera movement controls
- -Higher cost per generation
さっそく作ってみませんか？
videobaoなら両モデルを試せます — 1つのサブスクリプションで全モデル。