Comparison最終更新：2026-05-27
Veo 3.1 vs Kling 2.5
Google Veo 3.1とKuaishou Kling 2.5を比較：価格、解像度、音声、尺、最適ユースケース。2026年の実ベンチマークに基づく専門家比較。
Veo 3.1 — 最適な用途：
- +Professional commercial shoots
- +Cinematic B-roll and establishing shots
- +4K quality requirements
- +Text-in-video scenes
- +Brand-consistent content series
Kling 2.5 — 最適な用途：
- +Social media content (TikTok, Reels)
- +Product showcases and ads
- +Budget-conscious professional teams
- +Content requiring audio narration
- +Multi-clip storytelling
| Feature | HotVeo 3.1 Google | Kuaishou |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Kuaishou | |
| Price | 5 credits/video | 2 credits/video |
| Duration | 8s fixed | 5–10s variable |
| Resolution | 720p–4K | 720p–1080p |
| Aspect Ratios | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 21:9 | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 3:4, portrait, landscape |
| Native Audio | No | Yes |
| 先頭フレーム参照 | Yes | Yes |
| 最終フレーム参照 | No | Yes |
| Base64 Support | No | Yes |
| Negative Prompt | No | Yes |
| Prompt Enhancement | No | No |
| Camera Control | No | No |
Veo 3.1の弱点
- -Fixed 8-second clip duration
- -No native audio generation
- -No negative prompt control
- -No camera movement controls
- -Higher cost per generation
Kling 2.5の弱点
- -Max 1080p (no 4K)
- -Portrait-optimized but less cinematic
- -Less accurate text rendering
- -Slightly less consistent physics
- -No reference image for identity
さっそく作ってみませんか？
videobaoなら両モデルを試せます — 1つのサブスクリプションで全モデル。