Comparison最終更新：2026-05-27
Veo 3.1 vs Sora 2
Google Veo 3.1とOpenAI Sora 2を比較：価格、解像度、尺、一貫性、最適ユースケース。2026年の完全ベンチマーク比較。
Veo 3.1 — 最適な用途：
- +Professional commercial shoots
- +Cinematic B-roll and establishing shots
- +4K quality requirements
- +Text-in-video scenes
- +Brand-consistent content series
Sora 2 — 最適な用途：
- +OpenAI ecosystem users
- +Anime and stylized video generation
- +Multi-clip consistency-critical projects
- +Variable-duration creative content
- +Scene-to-scene consistency
| Feature | HotVeo 3.1 Google | HotSora 2 OpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Price | 5 credits/video | 5 credits/video |
| Duration | 8s fixed | 4–20s variable |
| Resolution | 720p–4K | 720p |
| Aspect Ratios | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 21:9 | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1 |
| Native Audio | No | No |
| 先頭フレーム参照 | Yes | Yes |
| 最終フレーム参照 | No | No |
| Base64 Support | No | No |
| Negative Prompt | No | No |
| Prompt Enhancement | No | No |
| Camera Control | No | No |
Veo 3.1の弱点
- -Fixed 8-second clip duration
- -No native audio generation
- -No negative prompt control
- -No camera movement controls
- -Higher cost per generation
Sora 2の弱点
- -Max 720p resolution only
- -No native audio
- -No negative prompt or camera control
- -Highest cost tier among comparables
- -Portrait/landscape orientation control less fine-tuned
さっそく作ってみませんか？
videobaoなら両モデルを試せます — 1つのサブスクリプションで全モデル。