Comparison最終更新：2026-07-29
Wan 2.6 vs Sora 2
Compare Wan 2.6 and Sora 2 on credits, duration, audio, and creative FX vs stylized narrative.
Wan 2.6 — 最適な用途：
- +Creative FX and transitions
- +Budget text-to-video experiments
- +Voiceover-friendly drafts
- +Camera-controlled motion tests
Sora 2 — 最適な用途：
- +OpenAI ecosystem users
- +Anime and stylized video generation
- +Multi-clip consistency-critical projects
- +Variable-duration creative content
- +Scene-to-scene consistency
| Feature | Alibaba | HotSora 2 OpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | OpenAI |
| Price | 3 credits/video | 5 credits/video |
| Duration | 5–15s | 4–20s variable |
| Resolution | 720p–1080p | 720p |
| Aspect Ratios | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4 | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1 |
| Native Audio | Yes | No |
| 先頭フレーム参照 | No | Yes |
| 最終フレーム参照 | No | No |
| Base64 Support | Yes | No |
| Negative Prompt | Yes | No |
| Prompt Enhancement | Yes | No |
| Camera Control | Yes | No |
Wan 2.6の弱点
- -Base64-oriented input workflow
- -No first/last frame refs like Kling
- -Less cinematic polish than Veo 3.1
- -Max 1080p (no 4K)
Sora 2の弱点
- -Max 720p resolution only
- -No native audio
- -No negative prompt or camera control
- -Highest cost tier among comparables
- -Portrait/landscape orientation control less fine-tuned
さっそく作ってみませんか？
videobaoなら両モデルを試せます — 1つのサブスクリプションで全モデル。