Comparison최종 업데이트: 2026-05-27

Sora 2 vs Kling 2.5

OpenAI Sora 2와 Kuaishou Kling 2.5 비교: 비용, 해상도, 오디오, 길이, 최적 사용 사례. 어떤 AI 비디오 모델이 프로젝트에 맞을까요?

Sora 2 — 최적 용도:

  • +OpenAI ecosystem users
  • +Anime and stylized video generation
  • +Multi-clip consistency-critical projects
  • +Variable-duration creative content
  • +Scene-to-scene consistency

Kling 2.5 — 최적 용도:

  • +Social media content (TikTok, Reels)
  • +Product showcases and ads
  • +Budget-conscious professional teams
  • +Content requiring audio narration
  • +Multi-clip storytelling
FeatureOpenAIKuaishou
ProviderOpenAIKuaishou
Price5 credits/video2 credits/video
Duration4–20s variable5–10s variable
Resolution720p720p–1080p
Aspect Ratios16:9, 9:16, 1:116:9, 9:16, 1:1, 3:4, portrait, landscape
Native AudioNoYes
첫 프레임 참조YesYes
마지막 프레임 참조NoYes
Base64 SupportNoYes
Negative PromptNoYes
Prompt EnhancementNoNo
Camera ControlNoNo

Sora 2의 아쉬운 점

  • -Max 720p resolution only
  • -No native audio
  • -No negative prompt or camera control
  • -Highest cost tier among comparables
  • -Portrait/landscape orientation control less fine-tuned

Kling 2.5의 아쉬운 점

  • -Max 1080p (no 4K)
  • -Portrait-optimized but less cinematic
  • -Less accurate text rendering
  • -Slightly less consistent physics
  • -No reference image for identity

만들 준비가 되셨나요?

videobao에서 두 모델을 모두 사용해 보세요 — 하나의 구독으로 모든 모델을.

Sora 2 vs Kling 2.5 - AI 비디오 생성기 비교 2026