Comparison最後更新：2026-07-29
Seedance 2 vs Kling 2.5
Compare Seedance 2 and Kling 2.5 on credits, audio, aspect ratios, and duration. Pick the better AI video model for social and ads.
Seedance 2 — 最適合：
- +Social media content calendars
- +Ultrawide / cinematic social formats
- +Multi-reference short videos
- +Teams needing audio + flexible length
Kling 2.5 — 最適合：
- +Social media content (TikTok, Reels)
- +Product showcases and ads
- +Budget-conscious professional teams
- +Content requiring audio narration
- +Multi-clip storytelling
| Feature | NewSeedance 2 ByteDance | Kuaishou |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance | Kuaishou |
| Price | 4 credits/video | 2 credits/video |
| Duration | 4–15s variable | 5–10s variable |
| Resolution | 480p–1080p | 720p–1080p |
| Aspect Ratios | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 21:9, adaptive | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 3:4, portrait, landscape |
| Native Audio | Yes | Yes |
| 首幀參考 | Yes | Yes |
| 尾幀參考 | Yes | Yes |
| Base64 Support | Yes | Yes |
| Negative Prompt | No | Yes |
| Prompt Enhancement | No | No |
| Camera Control | No | No |
Seedance 2 的不足之處
- -No 4K output
- -Less proven for text-in-video than Veo
- -Portrait-first workflows may prefer Kling
- -Newer model with fewer third-party writeups
Kling 2.5 的不足之處
- -Max 1080p (no 4K)
- -Portrait-optimized but less cinematic
- -Less accurate text rendering
- -Slightly less consistent physics
- -No reference image for identity
準備好開始創作了嗎？
在 videobao 上同時體驗兩款模型——一份訂閱，全部模型。