Comparison最后更新：2026-07-29
Hailuo 02 vs Kling 2.5
Compare Hailuo 02 and Kling 2.5 on price, audio, camera controls, and when to use each model.
Hailuo 02 — 最适合：
- +Narrative and dramatic sequences
- +Privacy-conscious uploads (base64)
- +Camera-driven motion drafts
- +Pre-production iteration before premium models
Kling 2.5 — 最适合：
- +Social media content (TikTok, Reels)
- +Product showcases and ads
- +Budget-conscious professional teams
- +Content requiring audio narration
- +Multi-clip storytelling
| Feature | MiniMax | Kuaishou |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Kuaishou |
| Price | 5 credits/video | 2 credits/video |
| Duration | 5–10s | 5–10s variable |
| Resolution | 512p–1080p | 720p–1080p |
| Aspect Ratios | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4 | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 3:4, portrait, landscape |
| Native Audio | No | Yes |
| 首帧参考 | Yes | Yes |
| 尾帧参考 | Yes | Yes |
| Base64 Support | Yes | Yes |
| Negative Prompt | Yes | Yes |
| Prompt Enhancement | Yes | No |
| Camera Control | Yes | No |
Hailuo 02 的不足之处
- -No native audio
- -Not the cheapest credits/video
- -Slower path for quick throwaway clips
- -Less brand awareness than Veo/Kling/Sora
Kling 2.5 的不足之处
- -Max 1080p (no 4K)
- -Portrait-optimized but less cinematic
- -Less accurate text rendering
- -Slightly less consistent physics
- -No reference image for identity
准备好开始创作了吗？
在 videobao 上同时体验两款模型——一份订阅，全部模型。