Comparison最后更新：2026-05-27
Sora 2 vs Kling 2.5
对比 OpenAI Sora 2 与快手 Kling 2.5：成本、分辨率、音频、时长与最佳用例。哪个 AI 视频模型更适合你的项目？
Sora 2 — 最适合：
- +OpenAI ecosystem users
- +Anime and stylized video generation
- +Multi-clip consistency-critical projects
- +Variable-duration creative content
- +Scene-to-scene consistency
Kling 2.5 — 最适合：
- +Social media content (TikTok, Reels)
- +Product showcases and ads
- +Budget-conscious professional teams
- +Content requiring audio narration
- +Multi-clip storytelling
| Feature | HotSora 2 OpenAI | Kuaishou |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Kuaishou |
| Price | 5 credits/video | 2 credits/video |
| Duration | 4–20s variable | 5–10s variable |
| Resolution | 720p | 720p–1080p |
| Aspect Ratios | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1 | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 3:4, portrait, landscape |
| Native Audio | No | Yes |
| 首帧参考 | Yes | Yes |
| 尾帧参考 | No | Yes |
| Base64 Support | No | Yes |
| Negative Prompt | No | Yes |
| Prompt Enhancement | No | No |
| Camera Control | No | No |
Sora 2 的不足之处
- -Max 720p resolution only
- -No native audio
- -No negative prompt or camera control
- -Highest cost tier among comparables
- -Portrait/landscape orientation control less fine-tuned
Kling 2.5 的不足之处
- -Max 1080p (no 4K)
- -Portrait-optimized but less cinematic
- -Less accurate text rendering
- -Slightly less consistent physics
- -No reference image for identity
准备好开始创作了吗？
在 videobao 上同时体验两款模型——一份订阅，全部模型。