videobao no ar com DouBao SeeDance 2.5 e MiniMax-H3 — 10 créditos ao se cadastrar

Assinar agora
ComparaçãoÚltima atualização: 2026-07-29

Seedance 2 vs Kling 2.5

Compare Seedance 2 and Kling 2.5 on credits, audio, aspect ratios, and duration. Pick the better AI video model for social and ads.

Seedance 2 — Melhor para:

  • +Social media content calendars
  • +Ultrawide / cinematic social formats
  • +Multi-reference short videos
  • +Teams needing audio + flexible length

Kling 2.5 — Melhor para:

  • +Social media content (TikTok, Reels)
  • +Product showcases and ads
  • +Budget-conscious professional teams
  • +Content requiring audio narration
  • +Multi-clip storytelling
RecursoByteDanceKuaishou
ProvedorByteDanceKuaishou
Preço4 credits/video2 credits/video
Duração4–15s variable5–10s variable
Resolução480p–1080p720p–1080p
Proporções16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 21:9, adaptive16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 3:4, portrait, landscape
Áudio NativoYesYes
Referência do Primeiro QuadroYesYes
Referência do Último QuadroYesYes
Suporte a Base64YesYes
Prompt NegativoNoYes
Aprimoramento do PromptNoNo
Controle da CâmeraNoNo

Onde Seedance 2 Deixa a Desejar

  • -No 4K output
  • -Less proven for text-in-video than Veo
  • -Portrait-first workflows may prefer Kling
  • -Newer model with fewer third-party writeups

Onde Kling 2.5 Deixa a Desejar

  • -Max 1080p (no 4K)
  • -Portrait-optimized but less cinematic
  • -Less accurate text rendering
  • -Slightly less consistent physics
  • -No reference image for identity

Pronto para criar?

Experimente ambos os modelos no videobao — uma assinatura, todos os modelos.

Seedance 2 vs Kling 2.5 — AI Video Comparison 2026 | videobao